Feature image: 2016 Pauline Hanson advertising, “Fed Up”. Nothing has changed.
Pauline Hanson Leader on ‘One Nation’ Party 2022
Anthony Albanese “Sit down, you’re rocking the boat.”
Pauline Hanson 2007
Pauline Hanson 2011
December 2nd, 2022, ‘Indigenous Voice to Parliament slammed by Pauline Hanson saying it divides by race.’ Story posted by Aidan Wondracz for Daily Mail Australia. (i)
Allan Ivarsson comments… I agree with Pauline Hanson. This one ‘Voice in Parliament’ idea will Divide Australia and encourage future civil conflicts in Australia. Such conflicts could easily spark ‘Civil War’.
Aboriginal MP’s can currently have a voice of parliament, and this is a justice process through being voted in based upon attitude and performance. Equality for all, demands equality in democratic process. We have that equality already in society. We do not want division and conflict that we destroy Australian Justice Process.
“Pauline Hanson has slammed the push to introduce an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, claiming it will segregate the country.” (i)
“The One Nation leader argued it would cause more harm than good and separate Australians based on their race.” (i)
“It’s about equality for all Australians regardless of your race, you know, to say that I have no connection to the land is a load of ‘bs’, I was born here, I love this country, they don’t have any more rights over it than what I do,” she told Sky News. (i)
A.I. comments… Likewise, I was born here, as first generation and I love this country.
“It will be rushed through, people will vote emotionally with it, thinking oh yeah, why not not it’s not gonna have an impact on us.” (i)
A.I. comments… Any person who votes ‘Yes’ for ‘One Aboriginal Voice in Parliament’ will suffer down-the-track from oppressive decisions that will deny them equality in the eyes of the law.
“Ms. Hanson argued she was an ‘Australian as much as any Aboriginal’ and that residents should be treated equally.” (i)
A.I. comments… Hanson remarks are exactly right.
“The One Nation leader demanded Anthony Albanese share more details about his proposal to hold a referendum.” (i)
A.I. comments…. Anthony Albanese refuses to be truthful to the people about his planned words to be included in the alteration of the Australian Constitution. Albanese is playing a chess game of ‘Cloak and Dagger’ to oppress the Australian people and strip down their equality rights and freedom privileges. Such a secret agenda mission reeks with ‘High Treason’ activity plans. If Albanese goes too far with wrong wording in the ‘Australian Constitution’, we Aussies may be forced to demand his arrest.
For this reason, it is imperative that all Australians vote “No” to any Referendum Change of our ‘Constitution’.
With secret objectives like this one planned by Albanese, how can we trust our shaky Prime Minister on any activity? Anthony Albanese thinking is unsteady and not reliable hence, we cannot trust this man to ever do the right thing by the Australian people.
Anthony Albanese is a Dunce. He will never get a Dux rating. He is all spin, no credibility.
“Opposition leader Peter Dutton has also refused to reveal where he stands on the matter until more information comes to light, despite his coalition partner Nationals already having seen enough to declare they couldn’t support it.” (i)
“They’ve had a really good conversation in the party room, there’s obviously a clear majority view they don’t think the government has provided enough detail, he [Dutton] said. (i)
A.I. comments… I am disappointed with Dutton. I thought he had more strength of character. It was obvious to me right from the beginning when Albanese refused to give us details of the planned change to the constitution that Albanese was planning a deceitful oppressive change to our constitution, and for that reason alone, I posted “No” upfront.
Dutton has indicated by his hesitancy to comment that he is playing a swinging game to win more votes. That cowardly behaviour by Dutton is not acceptable. In one decision by him, he lost my trust in his credibility.
“Pat Dodson from the government [#] is coming out saying there will be no detail and I don’t know how you can say to the Australian public, we want you to consider a really important aspect of public policy… and you end up in a situation where the government won’t provide any detail ahead of a vote and people reasonably are asking why.” (i)
# Wikipedia summary information about Pat Dodson…
Patrick Lionel Djargun Dodson (born 29 January 1948) is an Australian politician representing Western Australia in the Australian Senate. He is a Yawuru elder from Broome, Western Australia. He has been chairman of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, a Commissioner into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, and a Roman Catholic priest. He was the winner of the 2008 Sydney Peace Prize and the 2009 John Curtin Medallist. His brother is Mick Dodson, also a national Indigenous Australian leader.
On 2 March 2016, Dodson was announced as the replacement for Joe Bullock as a Labor Senator for Western Australia, following Bullock’s resignation. The Parliament of Western Australia appointed Dodson to the Australian Senate on 2 May 2016.
On September 30th, 2022, I published this about Patrick Dodson…
MP Allegra Spender
“Independent MP Allegra Spender backed the Labor government’s approach after correspondence with them on Thursday, saying they’d outlined the parliament of the day would shape what form the voice takes.” (i)
“She said the briefing had made clear the voice would have some ‘particular qualities’ including not sitting as a third chamber of government, adding a referendum was about tweaking the constitution rather than voting for a law change.” (i)
A.I. comments… Tweaking? This word suggests making improvements, fine adjustments to the Constitution by improving it. I don’t have any confidence in Spender, she has suggested that she is not an intelligent common-sense leader when she recommends that the people blindly vote ‘yes’ for ‘Referendum Change’, not knowing the exact wording to be inserted in the Constitution.
“The constitution is about principles, and this is a question of changes to the constitution, this is not a question of changes to legislation,” she [Allegra Spender] told ABC Radio. (i)
A.I. comments… Yes, the Constitution is about principles. And it is not about legislation of law changes, that can be voted in and out by Parliament, without the approval of the people. However, the people can challenge legislated laws, demanding change to the laws or that they be rescinded.
Allegra Spender whitewashed the concern, by ignoring that the Australian Constitution is ‘Constitutional Law’. It is the basic rules for the government of Australia. The Constitution is the fundamental law of Australia binding everybody including the Commonwealth and the Parliament of each State.
The Constitution can only be altered by referendum vote of the people; it cannot be altered just by Parliament MP votes. The people must also vote by referendum approving changes to the Australian Constitution.
For that reason, it is not acceptable to demand that the people vote ‘Yes’ to a Constitution Change, and not be able to read the exact word changes planned in the Constitution. Signing a ‘Blank Cheque’ is an idiotic expectation, it is saying the people don’t have the intelligence to understand the detail wording planned for the change.
Spender said, “I support the government in where it is going, and I support that the parliament of the day will determine what that looks like.” (i)
A.I. comments… What Spender is really saying is, “I support blind voting by the people to simply say ‘Yes’ in Referendum to changes in the Constitution, even when the people don’t know the detail of the planned words and sentences to be pasted into the Constitution.”
Allegra Spender is clearly an incompetent thinking MP and cannot be trusted with doing the right thing by the people in government. She needs to be voted out. She clearly thinks the people are dummies that can be blindly guided as sheep.
“Ms. Spender said there was a strong crossbench interest in the voice regarding how Indigenous communities could help shape it.” (i)
“This is something that will be there to… give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people a voice on the services that affected them,” she said. (i)
A.I. comments… Several well-known Aborigines oppose Albanese objective to give Aborigines a ‘Voice in Parliament’ with good reason. So far Allegra Spender has not read my collected written works on this planned Aboriginal Referendum. I doubt she has the ability to keep up with my skills level. Read more…
Allegra Spender said to the ABC Radio… “That is the fundamental reason why I’m supporting this, because we’ve spent decades with policies and laws that are in effect for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but they do not have the voice in terms of making sure this is actually what the communities want.” (i)
A.I. comments… if this insidious blind change to the Constitution becomes law, we the people, the non-Aboriginal People will have to demand by force that we are also given a ‘Voice in Parliament’. In short, we may have to launch ‘Civil War’ to get equality justice. As it stands if a ‘Voice to Parliament’ changes our Constitution, without detail approval by the people, injustice and inequality will expand conflict in our once ‘Lucky Country’.
MP Amanda Rishworth
Labor minister Amanda Rishworth said to ABC Radio, “What we are putting forward is a very simple proposition in terms of constitutional change – do First Nations people deserve to have a voice in the issues that affect them?” (i)
A.I. comments… Amanda Rishworth agrees with Allegra Spender, “I support blind voting by the people to simply say ‘Yes’ in Referendum to changes in the Constitution, even when the people don’t know the detail of the planned words and sentences to be pasted into the Constitution.”
Where do all these inferior thinking politicians come from? They have their University Degree Qualifications and call themselves intelligent, but they clearly do not have basic common-sense.
Intelligent people do not sign blank cheques. Albanese, Rishworth and Spender want the Australian People to blindly vote ‘Yes’ to a Referendum change, void of the knowledge of the planned detail change. These people obviously think Australians are blind sheep.
I will Vote “No” to referendum change for ‘Voice to Parliament’. I refuse to allow Albanese to play me like a puppet on a string.
Allan Ivarsson PhD P.I. 2022 (now 73 years of age.)
Founder, director, chairman of ‘things to come’ called ‘Cosmicism’. The way of ‘Blue Light Cosmic Philosophy’, the way of ‘Cosmic Libertarianism’ which uses the most advanced intelligence in the Universe called ‘Philosophical Intelligence’.
Ps. There are far too many people in life that think they have the right to dictate by force how other peaceful honourable decent people must live. Authoritarianism is not acceptable behaviour. Every person has the right to live free, in speech, choice and equality provided they do not abuse their ‘Freedom Privilege’ by denying others the same right to live free.
There is no place for any form of ‘Totalitarianism’ in a wholesome good decent society.
The Fight to Protect and Preserve Freedom Values…to be continued.