Why the European Court of Human Rights has been ‘Blacklisted’ by ‘Cosmicism’.

Musician’s Sense of Peace… How long will it last in a world restricting ‘Freedom of Speech’?

Feature Image… European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg France. Can we trust their eternal justice decisions? Or are they too wrapped up in their own self-importance to consistently live true to eternal justice which rules the Universe as defined by ‘Cosmic Law’?

Why the European Court of Human Rights has been ‘Blacklisted’ by ‘Cosmicism’.

(2018)

Introduction

Incident of Unjust Ruling of the ECHR on the Case of ‘Same-Sex Marriage’.

Incident of Unjust Ruling on the Case of Criticism of Muhammad.

Some Islamic Hadiths on Muhammad’s Marriage with a young ‘Virgin Child Bride’.

Incident of Austrian Injustice imposed upon Madam S.

Introduction

The protection and preservation of Human Rights is a valid very correct eternal objective. The problem is that Political and Judicial Organisations that claim to stand up for Human Rights are not standing true to that very important standard of essential beliefs and behaviour.

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg France has faltered to a lower level of shape-shifting integrity and decided to make variances to the conditions of Human Rights. In short, the ECHR, has betrayed its original commitment to protect the homo sapiens right to live free in speech, choice and equality.

The ECHR in a recent court judgement falsely claimed that defaming the so-called Prophet Muhammad was not the right of ‘Free Expression’. They falsely argued that such freedom of expression can stir up prejudice and risk religious peace by causing a conflict. The European Court of Human Rights refused to recognise the complete picture of truth that the Qur’an is riddled with ‘Hate Speech’ against all non-Muslims and that it instructs all Muslims to conquer all non-Muslims.

Based upon the ECHR seven-judge panel decision the Qur’an should be banned because it teaches ‘Hate Speech’ and it defames all non-Muslims and that every Muslim Cleric should be fined for teaching the Qur’an to Muslims which stirs up prejudice and risks religious peace by causing a conflict.

The ECHR decision also means that all religious leaders cannot be criticised or rejected including Moses, Buddha, Jesus, Meher Baba, Bab, Baha’u’llah, Abdu’l-Baha, Rishabhanatha, Mahavira, Guru Nanak and many others in every culture, too many to list.

According to the ECHR, I Allan Ivarsson cannot be criticised because I was appointed by God of Creation Commander-In-Chief of the Universe in 1961 at the age of 12 years to do a job. Is that true? That’s for you to figure out by the jigsaw pieces of information interwoven into my ‘Cosmic Philosophy’. But I will tell you this I can be criticised and rejected by unbelievers in much the same way that all religious leaders can be criticised and rejected, including the not saint, Muhammad.

No one religious or not is free to rule over others, void of criticism and rejection and that includes Muhammad.

I can tell you one thing, I did hear a voice giving me an instruction when I was 12-years of age, but I did not take it seriously and discounted the message. What happened during my dynamic life became a strange unplanned destiny. That’s all I will say at this point of time, because it is much ado about nothing, just like the ECHR decision is unjustly much ado about nothing.

In one deliberate anti-freedom of speech judgement the dishonest thinking ECHR decided that ‘Freedom of Speech’ must be restricted by anti-freedom of speech ‘Blasphemy Law’.

The ECHR claim that they support ‘Freedom of Speech’ is a lie. Their decision to restrict ‘Freedom of Speech’ in support of the wrong decision years earlier by the ‘Vienna Regional Criminal Court’ in Austria reveals how hypocritical is the claim that the ECHR stands for Human Rights. The ECHR claim that they stand for human rights is a false knowledge statement.

The ECHR is a hypocritical court and has demonstrated that it does not stand for the protection and preservation of 100% Human Rights in ‘Freedom of Speech’, Freedom of Choice’ and ‘Freedom of Equality’.

Years earlier in 2016 the ECHR also stated that ‘Same-Sex Marriage’ is not a human right, in other words the ECHR does not recognise the human right to 100% Equality.

With this understanding about the incompetent false foundation of the European Court of European Rights, we shall expand our understanding of the truth.

“The Dream of Human Rights and the Reality of Human Rights are two different things”. And the ECHR has proven that fear of offending others often hides the truth and forces people to live a life of oppression, lest they be bullied by unjust courts that meekly submit to the dictatorship of anti-freedom of speech ‘Blasphemy Law’ which is now a hypocritical law because the Qur’an itself teaches ‘Blasphemy’ against all other religions and is not ever prosecuted.

Clearly, the words ‘Human Rights’ has been corrupted by wrong interpretations and false knowledge perceptions. One historical reality is true… Muhammad did marry a six-year-old girl and did sexually consummate the marriage when the girl was only nine-years-old. That makes Muhammad a Paedophile and anyone that claims Muhammad was not a pedophile is a liar.

If the ECHR is not standing for ‘Truth, Integrity and Honour’ then its existence is incompetent and very deceitful and cannot be trusted with the protection and preservation of justice and should be closed down.

When ‘Islamization of Europe’ is completed and ‘Sharia Law’ rules Europe, the ECHR will be closed down by ‘Sharia Law’. ‘Jihad Muslims’ are not afraid to offend all non-Muslims including those judges in the ECHR.

There are too many incidents of misuse of political and judicial power that pretend to stand for ‘Human Rights’ when in fact they don’t. Two hypocrisy decisions made by the ECHR on the subject of ‘Same-Sex Marriage’ and on the subject of ‘Freedom of Speech’ proves that political and judicial power is often warped by false knowledge lack of logic and true integrity.

The ECHR does not comply with Reality-Based Ethics which starts with the essential foundation of the eternal human right to 100% ‘Freedom and Equality’.

The misuse of courts must always be identified. Injustice by deliberate intention is not acceptable not now, not ever. The ECHR made their wrong decision founded upon the fear of offending a religion capable of launching violence. The ECHR decision is an act of cowardice, because it refused to recognise the truth that Muhammad was a Paedophile and that all belief systems, religions included, and all persons, religious leaders included, can be criticised and rejected by the human right to like and hate ideas and doctrine. It is freedom of speech that helps protect society from becoming a ‘Totalitarian Society’. And both Islam and Communism have a history founded upon ‘Dictatorship Bully Doctrine’ which proves these two belief systems are ‘Totalitarian’ and do reject the human right to freedom of speech.

Anti-Freedom of Speech Socialism does also strive to oppress people.

The ECHR cannot be trusted with the flame of freedom and justice and for that reason the ECHR must be closed down. Every Nation must create its own Human Rights Justice Standards founded upon the eternal right to 100% ‘Freedom and Equality’.

We do not need a United Nations, a European Union, or a European Court of Human Rights or any other organisation to rule the people of every country. The Democratic Liberty Values of a country must work to establishing the highest standard of human rights without interference by dictatorship unjust rules as has been delivered by the incompetent ECHR.

There are many countries that are Totalitarian like Islamic Nations and Communist Nations and all that the Free World can do is to identify these unfree Nations and remember to never trust them because of their anti-freedom dictatorship policies.

The problem with the history of too many do-gooder organisations is that they start out with dreamy good intentions and then over the decades become gradually tainted by forms of ‘Totalitarian Policies’. That decline is not acceptable, not now, not ever.

This is the reason why ‘Cosmicism’ rejects the goal of becoming an organisation and shall always only be a very dynamic ‘Cosmic Philosophy’ which uses the most advanced thinking that which is called ‘Philosophical Intelligence’. Any ‘Belief System’ that cannot match the advanced high standards of ‘Cosmicism’ cannot ever succeed in being the best belief system. And that is the truth- whether you can handle it or not.

To know Allan Ivarsson and ‘Cosmicism’ you must read all his work, and better still to become smarter, study his ‘Cosmic Messages’ carefully and put the ‘Jigsaw Puzzle Pieces’ of Wisdom together as a dynamic united guide of advanced understanding.

Those persons that do not have P.I. can be defeated by those that do truly have P.I. skills.

Incident of Unjust Ruling of the ECHR on the Case of ‘Same-Sex Marriage’.

Jan Bentz on Life Site reported the following important information about the ECHR decision on ‘Same-Sex Marriage’ under the subject title of… ‘European Court of Human Rights: Same-sex ‘marriage’ is not a human right. (i)

(i) https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/european-human-rights-court-rejects-gay-marriage

Jan Bentz wrote… “Strasbourg, France, June 29, 2016– The European Court for Human Rights has ruled that same-sex “marriages” are not considered a human right, making it clear that homosexual partnerships do not in fact equal marriages between a man and a woman.” (i)

“The ruling was announced June 9 in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, and closed out a discussion dating to 2004.” (i)

Allan Ivarsson comments… the ECHR is very wrong and has been influenced by Christian belief system mentality which unjustly rejects the human right of same-sex marriage. I have dealt with this serious Same-Sex Marriage concern in different articles, some which have been published in my book ‘COMPENDIUM I’ Amazon.com.

Same-Sex Marriage is a human right… it is called “Freedom of Equality”.

This is another reason why the ECHR has been blacklisted by ‘Cosmicism’ because the ECHR has made it clear they reject the essential eternal values of 100% ‘Freedom of Equality’.

Jan Bentz continued his report… “The court’s decision was in response to an unlawful same-sex “wedding” conducted June 5, 2004, by Noel Mamere, mayor of the French city Begles and a member of the Green Party. At the time, Mamere explained the decision by saying, “Marriage is a social construct and procreation is no condition of its validity, otherwise we would need to render unions without children null.” (i)

A.I. comments… The idea that same-sex marriage is unlawful is a case of injustice enforced by the law and courts that have no sense of justice and do not stand for the eternal human right to 100% ‘Freedom of Equality’.

Same-Sex Marriage is a human right and to claim that it is not is a deceitful statement. This opposition to same-sex marriage has in its foundation a history of religious rejection of ‘Homosexuality’ which has an insidious past thinking and behaviour of cruelty towards ‘Gays’ as verified in Satanic Verses in the Old Testament Bible and the Torah and the Qur’an.

‘Totalitarianism’ in all Political and Religious Doctrine must always be rejected with the contempt that such false knowledge doctrine demands. ‘Freedom of Religion’ does not give people the right to impose abuse, cruelty and punishment based upon its biased bully mentality.

Even now ‘Gays’ in Islamic Countries are cruelly persecuted and punished many are even hanged, as happens in Sunni Saudi Arabia and Shiite Iran. This cruelty is not acceptable, not now, not ever.

Noel Mamere was correct when he said… “Marriage is a social construct and procreation is no condition of its validity, otherwise we would need to render unions without children null.” We must never forget the truthful wisdom of Mamere’s words.

Jan Bentz… “Mamere had advocated same-sex “marriage” since 2002 and chose to approve the 2004 “wedding” despite 4,000 letters sent to him. “I take the risk, I accept to be a provocateur,” Mamere said. The “marriage” was cancelled shortly after and the mayor was suspended from office for one month. Yet his effort sparked discussions in France and helped lead to the country’s approval of same-sex “marriages” in May 2013. (i)

A.I. comments… And all the disgraceful, smiled, thinking that they had stopped “Same-Sex Marriage”. They proved to be wrong and unjust as history unveiled the truth. Because of the courage of Mamere, France eventually changed its unjust opposition to same-sex marriage. Mamere was unjustly bully suspended for one month for having the courage to stand for ‘Freedom of Equality Human Rights’.

Meanwhile the ECHR refused to recognise the eternal human right of same-sex marriage and continued to oppose high standards of Human Rights thus the ECHR demonstrated how easy this ‘Judicial Organisation’ can be corrupted by unjust thinking and thus proved that the ECHR cannot ever be trusted to enforce true ‘human right’ justice. As a consequence of two strategic wrong thinking policy errors, the ECHR smashed their credibility and as a consequence has been ‘Blacklisted’ by ‘Cosmicism’, because unjust anti-freedom doctrine and policies is not acceptable, not now and not ever. Clearly, the ECHR cannot be trusted to always do the right thing to protect and preserve Human Rights and thus the ECHR must be dismantled. Every Nation must establish its own ‘Human Rights’ Policy Standards and should openly share those standards with the people of every Nation on Planet Earth/Gaia.

Through 100% ‘Freedom and Equality’ Standards every Nation can in teamwork build a better high standard of ‘Freedom and Equality’ values first for their own Nation and finally by sharing information with other Nations. We do not need global central authority Political/Judicial organisations controlling Nations. Such Global Central Political/Judicial organisations is a dangerous step towards the creation of ‘Totalitarianism’ ruling the planet and that ‘Dictatorship Position’ is not acceptable, not now, not ever.

Jan Bentz… “This month, 12 years after the incident, the European Court put an end to the matter. The ruling bars people with same-sex attraction from launching lawsuits to obtain a same-sex “marriage”. The decision is in direct opposition to lobbying by groups like ILGA (International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association), who fight for “equal marriage” rights and adoption rights for homosexual couples on an international scale and receive two-thirds of their financing from the EU Commission.” (i)

“The decision of the European Court for Human Rights should bring to a halt pressure exerted by the ILGA and similar groups, especially in Eastern European countries, who fight for legislation that recognises the uniqueness of a marriage between one man and one woman.” (i)

A.I. comments… Thus, the ECHR has locked down into an anti-freedom of equality policy, which smashes the credibility of the ECHR and verifies that the ECHR is not committed to the essential support of protection and preservation of 100% ‘Freedom and Equality’ Human Rights and for that reason, the power of the ECHR must be rejected, and the ECHR must be closed down. Every Nation is responsible for Governing itself and must work towards the creation of higher freedom and equality values. There is no place for central authority dictatorships ruling Nations. The ECHR must be dismantled, its unjust decisions must be rejected.

There is nothing wrong with supporting the human right to traditional ‘Heterosexual Marriage’. But Same-Sex Marriage must also share the same eternal right to ‘Freedom of Equality’.

‘Freedom of Religion’ is not acceptable when religion uses totalitarian bully tactics to oppress the eternal human right to freedom of speech, freedom of choice and freedom of equality. History has left a trail of proof over thousands of years in every culture that religion too often bullies and persecutes unbelievers and that thinking and behaviour is not acceptable, not now, not ever. The days of ‘Freedom of Religion’ Totalitarianism, is coming to an end.

It should be noted that whilst I do reject the EU because of its ‘Totalitarian thinking and behaviour’ it seems that it stands for the freedom of equality right of same-sex marriage and is in opposition to the incompetent decision made by the ECHR. In reality the ECHR should have been smarter than the EU, but clearly the ECHR has become an inferior thinking organisation as a consequence of its unjust decisions, which has been influenced by the dictatorship of Christian and Islamic Doctrine. In the next incident we will look at another unjust decision by the ECHR which is even more disturbing.

In COMPENDIUM I Book Amazon.com read five out of forty-one different variety subject articles, which deal with the concerns of Same-Sex Marriage and Gays & Lesbians. Those five subjects are…

# Hypocrisy of the Australian 1961 Marriage Act.

# Gays & Lesbians.

# The word ‘Marriage’ by whose definition?

# Countries that have Legalised Same-Sex Marriage.

# The Gay Marriage Thing.

Also read ‘Blacklist Policy’ in COMPENDIUM I.

Even the Internet has prowlers and shadow-banners and uses ‘Artificial Intelligence’ to ban publications of ideas it does not like; such Censorship is sad for the human race because it opens the gate to the destruction of freedom of speech and thus human rights. The foolish part of such censorship is that Internet Media depends upon advertising income to survive and if they look closely at anti-freedom of speech societies like in China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Iran etc. they do lose income and thus by promoting censorship they are inevitably planning their own economic suicidal demise, as anti-freedom of speech totalitarianism strives to silence people that value the eternal human right to 100% ‘Freedom of Speech’.

I hope the web-hosting company does not foolishly close down the Life Site’s web.

One thing that always amuses me is how Social Media and Websites want business and then strive to control what people can say. There is no place for violent threats but that is the only part of censorship that must be enforced.

Incident of Unjust Ruling on the Case of Criticism of Muhammad.

I would like to thank the great BNI for bringing this serious incident of wrong thinking insight to my attention, perpetrated once again by the limited unjust thinking of the ECHR.

And now for the story…

Recap: The ECHR claim that they support ‘Freedom of Speech’ is a lie. Their decision to restrict ‘Freedom of Speech’ in support of the wrong decision years earlier by the ‘Vienna Regional Criminal Court’ in Austria reveals how hypocritical is the claim that the ECHR stands for Human Rights. The ECHR claim that they stand for human rights is a false knowledge statement.

A DW News Report headline… “Calling Prophet Muhammad a pedophile does not fall within freedom of speech: European Court” (ii)

(ii) https://www.dw.com/en/calling-prophet-muhammad-a-pedophile-does-not-fall-within-freedom-of-speech-european-court/a-46050749

DW… “The ECHR ruled against an Austrian woman who claimed calling the Prophet Muhammad a pedophile was protected by free speech. The applicant claimed she was contributing to public debate.” (ii)

“An Austrian woman’s conviction for calling the Prophet Muhammad a pedophile did not violate her freedom of speech, the European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday.” (ii)

“The Strasbourg based ECHR ruled that Austrian courts carefully balanced the applicant’s “right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected and served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria.” (ii)

“The woman in 2009 held two seminars entitled “Basic Information on Islam”, during which she likened Muhammad’s marriage to a six-year-old girl, Aisha, to pedophilia.” (ii)

“An Austrian court later convicted the woman of disparaging religion and fined her 480 Euros. Other domestic courts upheld the decision before the case was brought before the ECHR.” (ii)

A.I. comments… The Austrian Courts using ‘Blasphemy Law’ legislation did ‘Limit Freedom of Speech’. And the hypocritical ECHR claimed that “calling Muhammad a pedophile did not violate her freedom of speech”, but then in a contradiction judgement, the ECHR implied that her freedom of speech did violate anti-freedom of speech Austrian ‘Blasphemy Law’ and did violate ‘Freedom of Religion’ even when that freedom of religion supports rejection of all others right to ‘Freedom of Religion’.

The ECHR supported the phony claim that the right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected, does serve the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria. By this doublespeak lack of logic, the ECHR decision proved the justice system of the ECHR is incompetent and is anti-freedom of speech. The suggestion that the ECHR supports ‘Freedom of Speech’ is a lie.

The inferior thinking ECHR judicial decision is made in violation of the higher ‘Freedom of Speech’ standards of the USA ‘First Amendment’ which does allow criticism of Muhammad and all other religious leaders. Thus, the injustice of the ECHR was served.

Based upon the Austrian Courts Decision against Madam S and by the same rejection of the woman’s free speech right to criticise and reject the teachings of Muhammad, the Qur’an must now be charged as guilty of failing to protect the religious feelings of others that do not believe in Islamic Doctrine and for failing to protect and preserve religious peace, because the Qur’an does clearly in its teachings reject the use of religious peace and does demand the elimination of all non-Muslims, including Jews and Christians and Atheists at the top of its list.

The Qur’an does reject ‘Freedom of Religion’.

Look at the history of the peaceful Bahai Faith how they have also been persecuted in the Middle East by Islam, as instructed in the Qur’an. The ignorant panel of seven judges in the European Court of Human Rights rejected the truth, choosing to wear coloured glasses pretending that they were defending the human right to freedom of speech, when in fact by an act of hypocrisy, they by their decision against Madam S, did reject the human right to 100% ‘Freedom of Speech’.

‘Cosmic Law’ automatically overrules the decision of the Austrian Courts and the European Court to enforce punishment of Madam S. And classifies the unjust decision against this woman as illegal by ‘Cosmic Law’ which rules the Universe as instructed by God of Creation Commander-In-Chief of the Universe.

In God We Trust.

News interpretation of the ECHR decision runs wild because of the incompetence of the unjust decision of seven limited thinking judges.

The Daily Sabah… posted the headlines… “Insulting Prophet Muhammad not ‘free speech’, ECHR rules.” (iii)

(iii) https://www.dailysabah.com/europe/2018/10/25/insulting-prophet-muhammad-not-free-speech-ecthr-rules

Daily Sabah… “Defaming the Prophet Muhammad exceeds the permissible limits of freedom of expression, ruled the European Court of Human Rights, upholding an Austrian court’s decision.” (iii)

“The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled Thursday that an Austrian woman’s criminal conviction and fine for her statements accusing the Prophet Muhammad of pedophilia did not breach her right to free speech.” (iii)

A.I. comments… More doublespeak lack of logic sent out to the world by the wrong thinking and unjust decision of the ECHR. The fine and claim that she is a criminal for what she said about Muhammad which was the truth, is a breach of her right to freedom of speech.

‘Freedom of Speech’ does give a person the right to say things which may offend others who suffer from immature feelings and refuse to accept calmly the right of others to disagree with ideas, belief systems, and doctrines. ‘Freedom of Speech’ does correctly deny people the right to demand punishment of people for what they say and does also support the right of others to say what they think, even when their ideas are wrong.

In fact, the Austrian Courts decision against Madam S and the ECHR decision against this woman treating her like a criminal is a complete travesty of justice and is a breach of the higher American ‘Liberty Value’ standards, the right example for the world that which is called the ‘First Amendment’. The ECHR and the Austrian Courts need to lift their game and abolish ‘Blasphemy Law’ period.

It should also be noted that all ‘Blasphemy Laws’ and all forms of anti-freedom of speech laws are outlawed by ‘Cosmic Law’. And it is a criminal action to disobey ‘Cosmic Law’ Universal Standards of the eternal human right to 100% ‘Freedom of Speech’ and 100% ‘Freedom of Choice’ and 100% ‘Freedom of Equality’.

Daily Sabah… “Stating that the court had found that “the applicant’s statements had been likely to arouse justified indignation in Muslims” and “amounted to a generalization without factual basis”, the Strasbourg based ECHR said that the woman’s comments could not be covered by freedom of expression.”

A.I. comments… Justified indignation? Doublespeak messages are really flying around the world in news reports inspired by court injustice. What do people think ‘Freedom of Speech’ is? A controlled restricted speech? Wake Up! ‘Freedom of Speech’ is the eternal human right using ahimsa speech verbally and in writing, to speak freely, a person cannot ever be prosecuted for what they say except when they make violent threats.

The woman’s comments are covered by ‘Freedom of Speech’ and anyone who claims freedom of speech does not protect her… is a liar. It is anti-freedom of speech laws, including evil ‘Blasphemy Law’ which are denying people like Madam S and others to the human right to ‘Freedom of Speech’.

Restricting ‘Freedom of Speech’ is an act of Gangsterism.

‘Cosmic Law’ protects every persons right to ‘Freedom of Speech’ and does outlaw all ‘Blasphemy Laws.

Furthermore, the claim that “the applicant’s statements… “amounted to a generalization without factual basis” is a lie. Islamic Hadiths do verify the marriage of Muhammad to six-year-old Aisha.

Read some Hadiths further down that table factual basis.

BNI responded turning the criticism pressure against the ECHR decision correctly tabling serious concerns about this wrong decision by the courts. (iv)

(iv) http://barenakedislam.com/2018/10/25/sharia-compliant-european-court-of-human-rights-has-ruled-that-insulting-defaming-the-prophet-muhammad-is-not-protected-by-freedom-of-expression/

Another news report by the AA… tabled the headline… “Defaming Prophet Muhammad not free expression: ECHR (v)

(v) https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/defaming-prophet-muhammed-not-free-expression-echr/1292823

AA News concluded… “The court held “that by considering the impugned statements as going beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate and classifying them as an abusive attack on the Prophet of Islam, which could stir up prejudice and put at risk religious peace, the domestic courts put forward relevant and sufficient reasons.” (v)

“The statement also added that there had been no violation of Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights, covering freedom of expression.” (v)

A.I. comments… No violation of Article 10… covering freedom of expression? Given the decision by the ECHR against Madam S that suggests that Article 10 is inadequate and needs investigation.

Debate beyond permissible limits? That idea is an anti-freedom of speech statement enforced by ‘Blasphemy Law’.

Risk religious peace? The Qur’an rejects religious peace until all non-Muslims submit to Islam. Why isn’t the Qur’an on trial for offensive teachings and deliberate instructions which reject religious peace with all non-Muslims? I figured that out in 1984 when I read the Koran. Why are judges in courts so incapable of understanding the ‘Dark Truth about Islamic Doctrine’ and the Qur’an? Or are they simply cowards too afraid to deal with the truth?

‘Jihad Muslims’ attacking kafir/infidels are not doing it because as individuals they are individually mean in character and thus nasty. They genuinely believe in Muhammad. Which is why they attack, because the Qur’an instructions verified by Hadiths, tells them they must fight war against all non-Muslims and force them to submit to Islam. Why are so many of our Judges and Politicians so incompetent that they cannot understand that a person’s belief system is the reason for their thinking and behaviour? Now you know why I do not have much respect for many degree qualifications. Any University degree that does not support the eternal human right to 100% ‘Freedom of Speech’ is not worth a damn.

Islam is a ‘Totalitarian Belief System’ which is why Islam is not compatible with Western Values of Freedom. Islam and Freedom will never assimilate because it is a bad marriage of ideas. Totalitarianism and Freedom are not compatible. Only fools cannot comprehend this fact.

Some Islamic Hadiths on Muhammad’s Marriage with a young ‘Virgin Child Bride’.

Thus Muslims also prove that Mohammed was a Paedophile Sex Abuser.

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death). Narrated by ‘Ursa.

Source: Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88:

“Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married “Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old. Narrated by Hisham’s father.

Source: Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236:

“The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill, and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girlfriends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. Narrated by Aisha.

Source: Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234:

“When the Prophet married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon. Narrated Aisha.

Source: Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 90:

“That the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (until his death). Narrated Aisha.

Source: Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:

“When we came to Medina, the women came to me when I was playing on the swing, and my hair was up to my ears. They brought me, prepared me, and decorated me. Then they brought me to the Apostle of Allah and he took up cohabitation with me, when I was nine. Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin.

Source: Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4917:

Incident of Austrian Injustice imposed upon Madam S.

Before we leave this anti-freedom of speech unjust court decision… I recall my earlier published work on the incident of Austrian Injustice, imposed upon Madam S dated March 31, 2018.

Extract Source: ‘Austria Land of the Not Free’.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff bully persecuted by unjust anti-freedom of speech legislation.

“We have had Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff on our program several times. She was speaking at an event about the history of the Prophet Muhammad. She spoke of the 6-year-old girl he took as a wife, and called that relationship pedophilia, which of course it is. She was sued by her country for disparaging the Prophet and offending Islam. She said something that was true, and it got her into legal trouble.” (vi)

(vi) http://www.fortressoffaith.org/blog/2017/01/27/freedom-of-speech-in-canada/

A.I. comments… Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff is Austrian. She was forced into court in Austria during November 2010, because of anti-Islamic truthful comments she made during a seminar to the Freedom Education Institute in 2009. She was acquitted of incitement, but was fined 450 Euros, for denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognised religion. This was enforced by evil ‘Blasphemy Law’ which rules Austria – Section 188 of the Austrian Criminal Code.

Apparently, the Austrian judge declared that though Muhammad was married to 6-year-old Aisha, he lived with her until his death, when Aisha was 18 years old. The judge decided that Muhammad must have liked adults also. Such was this inferior thinking judge’s unjust reasoning. Consequently, Elizabeth was unjustly fined; such is the criminal nature of anti-freedom of speech ‘Blasphemy Law’. Now you know, why I don’t have much respect for degree qualifications in law coming out of universities. Law thinking is often reckless, irresponsible and unjust. Which means degree training in law, is not consistently reliable, because it is not backed by ‘Philosophical Intelligence’.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was lucky that she was not found guilty of ‘incitement’, because her comments can be interpreted to be incitement or not incitement, per the interpretation of a judges thinking. And certainly, prosecutors would no doubt strive to demand full severity punishment. These flimsy anti-freedom of speech laws are evil in every sense of the legal words.

I saw Religion in Austria Logistics for 2015-2016, which stated the percentage of different religions in this country was…

Christianity 69.3%

Islam 7.0%

Buddhism 0.2%

Judaism 0.1%

Other religions 23.4%

Obviously, the logistics of Jews in Austria is small today, because of the invasion by evil Hitler, in which thousands of Jews were arrested by the Nazis and executed in the Holocaust and others, luckier, escaped and transferred out of the region. But the thing that caught my understanding was that the rule of ‘Blasphemy Law’ was created by Christians, not Muslims. Hence, anti-freedom of speech legislation although now supported by Islam for obvious reasons, is the product thinking of foolish Christians.

Unfortunately, I cannot read Austrian German language, but it appears that a trail of ‘Blasphemy Law’ legislation changes starts around 1867, moving through the dates of 1920, 1955, 1958, 1974 & 1975. I don’t know the detail of the changes or how accurate those speculation date changes are, but I do know human nature often changes law wording, motivated by their own limited thinking obsessions good and bad.

Per Wikipedia about ‘Blasphemy Law’… the following Austrian Legal insight was tabled… I have no reason to believe it was not accurate at the time of posting… (vii)

“Strafgesetzbuch: (German meaning ‘Criminal Code’) Legal Information System of the Republic of Austria. 1975. Retrieved 13 October 2015. Section 188: Vilification of Religious Teachings: Anyone who publicly disparages a person or thing that is the object of worship of a domestic church or religious society, or a doctrine, [or other] behaviour is likely to attract legitimate offense shall be punished… Section 189: Disturbance of Religious Practice: (1) Whoever prevents by force or threat of violence, the law permitted such service or individual acts of worship in a church or religious community existing domestic or interfere, shall be punished with imprisonment… (2) Whoever [commits in a Church or religious place] mischief that is likely to attract legitimate offense shall be punished…” (vii)

(vii) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law#Austria

A.I. comments… Obviously, this dark legislation thinking can be traced back to the Dark Ages when Roman Christianity cruelly murdered people charged with Blasphemy or Heresy. It may have softened in so far as cruelly killing people has ceased, but the anti-freedom bully status of ‘Blasphemy Law’ is still being enforced in Austria. It is still a law that can be misused and abused to satisfy personal agendas to put other people down.

There no justice in the legalised process of persecuting people for their public opinion.

In a freedom of speech world, only immature people are offended by someone else’s criticism and rejection of ideas.

Threats of violence can be covered by common-sense criminal codes and don’t need to be enforced by anti-freedom of speech legislation.

The thing that amazes me is how stupid smug thinking Christians are when they claim that anti-freedom of speech ‘Blasphemy Law’ must be enforced. The Christians got away with it when they were the only dominate Abrahamic ideology. But now cleverer Islam, has invaded their territory, and though at present their population numbers are less than Christians, the Muslims are tougher and more aggressive than Christians, and will use ‘Blasphemy Law’ to overpower Christianity.

‘Blasphemy Law’ keeps all Muslims united, because most Muslims are afraid to leave Islam and become an ex-Muslim, whilst Blasphemy Law exists, and many that don’t want to leave Islam are even afraid to relax their fanatical demands and dress codes, to enjoy some benefits of Western Freedom, whilst Blasphemy Law exists.

Based upon Austrian Law, if a courageous Christian Church leader speaks against the Qur’an, he too can be persecuted by Muslims using ‘Blasphemy Law’. Christians have committed religious suicide by enforcing ‘Blasphemy Law’ and have thus empowered Islam to conquer them as instructed in the Qur’an, such is the naïve ignorant stupidity of Christians. If Christians had any sense they would demand the banning of ‘Blasphemy Law’ and the banning of all anti-freedom of speech laws in every Western Nation. Who said Christians are that smart?

Freedom of Life exists in Austria except for humans, they are ruled by what they are allowed to say and not say.

Madam S is a victim of injustice persecuted by anti-freedom of speech ‘Blasphemy Law’ started by Christianity now backed by Islam and enforced by unjust decisions in Austrian Courts. And now enforced by the ‘European Court of Human Rights’ that believes ‘Freedom of Speech’ must be restricted and controlled and thus the gate is now open to persecute those who openly speak freely.

Cosmic Law is perpetual/everlasting. I have written much about ‘Cosmic Law’ it overrules all forms of ‘Totalitarianism’ and all unjust bully legislation and all unjust judicial decisions.

Now you know why the ECHR has been ‘Blacklisted’ by ‘Cosmicism’.