Unjust American Lawsuit attacks the FBI…

Scroll down to content

Feature Image: This is American Patriotism.

Patriotism in every Nation is important when it stands for Justice, Freedom and the Right Way.

Freedom must be defended and protected always, by every Nation, if they want to survive with a good ‘Quality of Life.’

The Shadows – F.B.I. (1961)

Unjust American Lawsuit attacks the FBI

Prejudice and Incompetence started this wrong thinking lawsuit.

Journalists in every country often do great work writing ‘Sensationalist News’. But when we make the effort to investigate the trail of jigsaw puzzle interface pieces, we often discover a dark reality about news information, which gives # ignorant people false knowledge perceptions that fails to table the real truth. However, it must be noted that Caroline Downey, in her report did identify the source of the problem. (i)

# Every person that lives and has lived is ignorant in some way or another. There is no end to learning. We face danger constantly when we lack the knowledge to understand the danger. Myths and False Knowledge are our enemies. Without Wisdom we are handicapped and vulnerable. Hate and Panic are our self-destructive enemies. Fear is a natural self-preservation instinct, which is why it is important that we learn to be ‘The Eye of Calm in a Storm’. A person who lacks ‘Emotional Intelligence’ is an enemy of their own self.

This presentation is evidence of wrong interpretation, wrong allegations and wrong lawsuit, directed against the wrong organisation by the wrong thinking of people and by an incompetent American Law Firm.

Justice is only served when the truth is accurately tabled. Now there are missing jigsaw pieces of information in this story, however, there is enough overview evidence to indicate the lawsuit launched was wrong and unjust. And the people that caused this injustice now need more journalist investigation to identify their mismanagement of a genuine serious concern, that is, ‘Violent Abusive Threats against others must be outlawed. But such corrective action enforcement does not need the FBI outside the boundary objectives of the ‘Patriot Act’ to enforce corrective action in local counties that should always be managed by Local Police.

So why am I an Australian, reviewing this United States Legal Conflict incident?

Because this is an excellent overview ‘Case Study’ for all Philosophers, Journalists and Legal Minds to think about how ‘Justice Process’ can create ‘Injustice’ in decisions founded upon wrong perceptions, false allegations and lack of Emotional Intelligence overreaction and worse prejudice thinking that challenges the wrong people in the wrong way, because those in attack mode, failed to do accurate investigative homework.

This is an important ‘Case Study’ Incident, for all people that want to learn how to become smarter in thinking.

I keep posting forward that without ‘Philosophical Intelligence’ used in Communication Skills every ‘Degree Qualified’ Person is second best. Many by their wrong thinking demonstrate by their actions that their ‘Degree Qualifications’ belong in the garbage bin. Parrot thinkers can learn how to succeed in ‘Graduation’ when we obey training rules even if the education taught is wrong in its thinking foundation. Teaching the truth is a more important objective.

Philosophy good and bad, just and unjust, true and false, decent and indecent, fair or not is the foundation of all human ideas and ‘Belief Systems’ and for this reason what happens in other countries is an important learning curve about what we should do and not do when faced with a societal problem, a human nature belief concern as to what is right or wrong in thinking and behaviour.

Human Nature and Ideas and ‘Belief Systems’ is a global problem that can impact upon any society culture anywhere, anytime. We all need to learn more understanding about different ideas including ones that collide with each other. The path of peace and good solution justice is not easy to establish and maintain.

And now the courageous academics journey forward to increase their wisdom and understanding.

We all need to become smarter… clever is not good enough.

Allan Ivarsson 2021

(i) https://www.nationalreview.com/news/parents-sue-ag-garland-for-violating-free-speech-rights-with-fbi-school-board-memo/?

The following disturbing news report by Caroline Downey hit the table hard on the 19th, October 2021. Subject titled… ‘Parents Sue AG Garland for Violating Free Speech Rights with FBI School-Board Memo.’ (i)

Allan Ivarsson comments… “Disturbing?” Yes, because too often now in every Western Nation ‘Freedom of Speech’ is being recklessly denied and the importance of ‘Quality of Speech Manners’ which means respecting others, void of abuse, coarse language and threats is being neglected by too often misuse of ‘Freedom of Speech’. Without Manners and Wisdom our ‘Free Speech’ is not worth much. Abuse, coarse language and threats are a negligent irresponsible misuse of ‘Freedom Privilege’ and must always be correctly criticised. An opinion right or wrong is not worth a damn if it lacks manners and a sense of decency and respect for others.

A good person always thinks carefully and chooses their words carefully before speaking and writing. Those who use coarse language disgrace themselves. Those who abuse others in a rant and rave activity, lack common-sense and ‘Emotional Intelligence’. Those persons void of E.I. are easily discernible as being weak in character, void of calm logic. Those persons who make violent threats are evil and without honour. And therefore, must be opposed.

America correctly enjoys the ‘First Amendment’ the right to ‘Free Speech’. But…

Over the last few decades, the promotional rise of ‘Lawsuits’ against others is in conflict with the human right to free speech.

Many Lawsuits are focused on denying people the right to ‘Free Speech’ even when words tabled, be they right or wrong, are spoken or written using ‘Quality of Speech Manners’. This is why those who use the most advanced intelligence in the world, called ‘Philosophical Intelligence’ are concerned about the excessive misuse of lawsuits.

Now we explore this news report incident tabled by Caroline Downey to see if enough information exists to discern the why the conflict exists. Headlines does not tell us anything it just gives us a point of concern.

“A federal civil rights lawsuit was filed Tuesday on behalf of a coalition of parents against Attorney General Merrick Garland, claiming that his recent memo directing the FBI to investigate and potentially prosecute “threats” leveled by parents against school board members is intended to chill speech.” (i)

A.I. comments… No, it does not chill speech, it does correctly oppose ‘Abusive Violent Threats’ against others who speak their truth, their understanding, be it right or wrong.

“Judeo-Christian public interest law firm American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) brought the suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of parents from Saline, Mich., and Loudoun County, Va. Both towns have developed reputations as hot spots for school board fights over equity and inclusion initiatives and critical race theory. (i)

A.I. comments… The reference of two towns being ‘Hot Spots’, suggests the need for peaceful investigation as to why these towns are hot spots. Do they have belief system conflicts, or are they prejudiced against each other? We need to understand what these parents believe, in order to understand why they are ‘Hot Spots’.

‘Critical Race Theory’ is a separate independent subject study and should not be included in this review, even though some thinking, and behaviour may be correctly or incorrectly occurring to create ‘hot spot’ conflicts. It is wiser to separate the right and wrong of ‘critical race theory’ as an independent subject concern.

“The AG Policy is a direct threat and warning to parents and private citizens across the United States, including Plaintiffs, that the Department of Justice and its FBI will be investigating you and monitoring what you say at these school board meetings so be careful about what you say and how you say it, thereby chilling such expression,” the legal filing states.” (i)

“The lawsuit claims that the memo authorizes unconstitutional federal intervention in local affairs. In the filing, the AFLC attorneys point out that the unruly behaviour of parents at some school board meetings, even yelling or crude language, is still protected speech under the Constitution and questions what right the federal government has to involve itself in cases where parents’ speech crosses the line into threats of violence.” (i)

A.I. comments… The lawsuit challenge is not valid; it is sad that people think the concern must be resolved by an expensive unnecessary lawsuit. There should be a ‘Federal Law’ which denies the FBI the right to interfere in local government concerns and responsibilities, including the management of behaviour in schools, which does not incite terrorism.

As a parent if I was threatened by a person, I would hand the problem over to local Police and not to Federal Authority. ‘Threats of Violence’ is an anti-freedom of speech behaviour and is an abuse of Freedom Privilege and is a criminal action in a decent society founded upon ‘Quality of Speech Manners’.

“It fails to address the Department of Justice’s lack of jurisdiction to intrude on interactions between parents and local school boards in the absence of any federal crime, and it fails to account for the fact that the First Amendment protects political dissent- even dissent that rises to the level of intimidation or harassment,” the lawsuit adds.” (i)

A.I. comments… Whilst the lawsuit team is correct in rejecting the right of the FBI to intervene, nevertheless one of their arguments is defined incorrectly and should not have been put on the table as an argument to opposes FBI intervention. Why? because the incorrect statement is still an important local Police concern.

Revisit the statement… “…the First Amendment protects political dissent- even dissent that rises to the level of intimidation or harassment,” (i)

It is reasonable and correct to allow ‘Freedom of Speech’ in political dissent. But when dissent rises to the use of bully intimidation and harassment that is not acceptable behaviour not even in a ‘Free Speech Society’; the perception tabled by the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) that the First Amendment approves of bully activity is not true. Such bully tactics is a ‘Local Police’ responsibility to resolve.

The First Amendment does not give people the right to intimidate and harass others, nor does it give people the right to threaten others with the use of violence.

The Judeo-Christian public interest law firm American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) who brought the suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia lied when it claimed that the ‘First Amendment’ gives people the right to intimidate and harass people.

American First Amendment

December 15th, 1791

Notice… “The right of people peacefully to assemble”. The First Amendment does not approve of the bully forceful use of violence, threats, intimidation and harassment of people. The American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) lied in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

A.I. comments… so what did the FBI memo say?

The last FBI sentence… “The Department is steadfast in its commitment to protect all people in the United States from violence, threats of violence, and other forms of intimidation and harassment.” This last sentence truthfully reads correct as a patriotic objective. However, it leans too reliant on the use of the ‘Patriot Act’ which has some flaws in its legislation.

A.I. comments… The well-written memo does table some correct concerns about people’s speech behaviour. However, the FBI intervention and prosecution method does open the gate of ‘Authoritarianism’ to takeover ‘Freedom of Society’ and oppress ‘Freedom of Speech’ denying people the right to speak freely. This Federal FBI intervention creates a very dangerous anti-freedom precedent, which is capable of pushing the people in a society into a dictatorship ruled society, swinging towards a ‘Marxist Mentality’ and such an anti-freedom of speech ideology is not acceptable thinking and behaviour.

There are valid American Concerns about the misuse of the ‘Patriot Act’ by over enthusiastic FBI personnel.

This is one point of view concern on the table…

“Since the Patriot Act was first enacted, it has been met with heavy criticism from numerous parties, including the general public. One of the biggest criticisms is that Act gives too much power to law enforcement. Critics believe that the surveillance portion of the law can be used against individuals who are not actually terrorists, like political protesters.” (ii)

Another widely held belief, even among many members of Congress, is that the Act does not protect civil liberties. In at least one investigation, the Inspector General of the Justice Department found that misuse of the Patriot Act powers was common in FBI cases, particularly those cases that did not involve suspected terrorists.” (ii)

(ii) https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-the-patriot-act.html

The question also has not been put on the table… “Who were the Whistleblowers that ran to the FBI looking for intervention? And Why?” Somebody complained to get Attorney General Merrick Garland’s attention.

The answer to this question is tabled below.

It is the responsibility of all ‘Schools’ and ‘School Boards’ to establish guideline ‘Quality of Speech Manners’ behaviour in meetings. Such managers of decent speech need to be managed by the ‘Moderator’ of the meeting and not by FBI Dictatorship. ‘Bad Manners’ in speech must not be classified as a crime, until someone threatens violence. Then this is a local Police concern and not a Federal FBI concern.

The protection of children is a local ‘Police Duty’ based upon common-sense local caring responsibility.

School Teachers, Headmistress and Headmasters are duty bound to ensure all parental problems and all children problems are correctly managed by the school. And that the ‘School Board’ is informed of any serious concerns and vice versa in exchange of information and understanding.

The opening address of all meetings should always reference by the ‘Moderator’ the importance of ‘Quality of Speech Manners’ in any meeting and what those standards are. People who refuse to respect ‘Manners’ in speech may be asked by the ‘Moderator’ to leave the meeting. The ‘Moderator’ has the right to stop the meeting when bad manners speech is used. This control process in a ‘Freedom of Speech Society’ does not need the FBI to manage the process. ‘School Standards’ and ‘Local Police Rules’ define what is not acceptable in behaviour, when it crosses the line of decency into indecent behaviour.

Even though the FBI memo stated valid concerns in thoughts it nevertheless overstepped its position of authority when it chose to become dictator ruler of all Schools, Parents and Local Police with the aggressive objective of oppressing ‘Freedom of Speech’. The concern of the FBI personnel is valid as a parent. But not as an FBI intervention dictator.

The FBI memo should have been written, not as a warning of FBI Intervention, but as a recommendation to local ‘Police Authorities’ that certain concerns brought to FBI attention, need a philosophy of local Police corrective action when some people threaten others. Such advice if well-written can then be used to inspire local Police to investigate any bad threatening behaviour in Schools.

“Per the document, the group of concerned parents are requesting a court order to cancel Garland’s policy, which instructs the FBI to collaborate with local, state, and federal law enforcement to investigate parents who have threatened school administrators.” (i)

In a ‘Free Speech’ Society it is wrong to use ‘Lawsuits’ to stop wrong dictatorship intervention. The challenge must be to establish a law that denies FBI intervention in local law incidents, which are not a breach of ‘Federal Law’ security concerns.

One thing is correct, parents who threaten school administrators need to be prosecuted by local Police. ‘Threatening others’ is not acceptable societal behaviour and must always be outlawed in every society.

The Department of Justice issued its memo in response to a letter from the National School Board Association, which claims to represent school board members nationwide, urging the Biden administration to consider whether confrontations by outraged parents qualify as domestic terrorism under the Patriot Act.” (i)

A.I. comments… Hence, we can see who the Whistleblowers’ are that started this roundabout misguided lawsuit against the FBI who sincerely responded to a cry of help from ‘The National School Board Association’.

Common-sense identifies that AG Garland acted correctly as a concerned caring patriot to a plea for help by the ‘National School Board Association’.

If a lawsuit was necessary, it should have been directed at the ‘National School Board Association’ the creators of this conflict battle with interference allegations.

Previously stated… “Judeo-Christian public interest law firm American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) brought the suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of parents from Saline, Mich., and Loudoun County, Va.” (i)

It clear that this Judeo-Christian public interest law firm (AFLC) is incompetent and should have identified that the culprit that triggered this ‘Political Drama’ in USA Society is not FBI AG Garland.

The culprit that started this unjust overreaction is the ‘National School Board Association’.

Clearly the ‘American Freedom Law Center’ did not bother to do their homework properly and were more focused on being vindictive against the FBI and were striving for reasons of greed to make a profit through the court to impose an unjust prosecution against the FBI, who simply did their duty to the best of their ability in response to a ‘Public Plea for Help’.

American Internet Notes… The Department of Justice’s first priority is to prevent future terrorist attacks. Since its passage following the September 11, 2001, attacks, the Patriot Act has played a key part – and often the leading role – in a number of successful operations to protect innocent Americans from the deadly plans of terrorists dedicated to destroying America and our way of life.

While the results have been important, in passing the ‘Patriot Act’, Congress provided for only modest, incremental changes in the law. Congress simply took existing legal principles and retrofitted them to preserve the lives and liberty of the American people from the challenges posed by a global terrorist network.

A.I. comments… Congress clearly made simple common-sense changes in the law focused on protecting and preserving the rights of all Americans to live free in peace, void of harassment. Thus, the duty of the FBI is to protect Americans from the violent threat of terrorism. No doubt there are times when the FBI must work with the CIA and Local Police Authorities to protect American People.

The NSBA failed to consult at least 13 state school board organizations before requesting federal intervention. Many of these state chapters have argued that the national headquarters overstepped its bounds and infringed upon the constitutional authority of local school boards to manage the public-school systems in their states, the non-profit ‘Parents defending Education’ (PDE) reported.(i)

A.I. comments… Now the truth hits the table, the culprit that unjustly caused the tabling of this lawsuit is the NSBA not the FBI. I hope the judge in this court cases rejects the unjust persecution of the FBI and correctly demands an investigation into the thinking and behaviour of the NSBA personnel that tabled this incorrect deceitful letter to encourage the FBI involvement in a prejudiced abuse of truth. Every person that authorised this NSBA letter to the FBI should be prosecuted for inciting unjust allegations.

Furthermore, the American Freedom Law Center should be prosecuted and fined for falsely threatening the FBI by Lawsuit Action. This public prosecution will send a warning message to all persons to be careful and make sure they can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that their lawsuit is just and true.

Every person that incited the creation of this letter to the FBI should be investigated to identify their ‘Belief System’. One of the serious flaws of the ‘Free World’ is the lack of courage of the Political and Law and Order System to identify openly a persons ‘Belief System’. Justice cannot be served until we have the truthful courage to identify a person’s ‘Belief System’ and the why they are prejudiced. This latter concern is an objective that all Societies in the ‘Free World’ still do not have the courage to accept and approve as a public right to know a person’s ‘Belief System’ and the reason for their thinking and behaviour.

Moreover, the vast majority of incidents cited in the NSBA letter to justify federal meddling did not involve violent threats. Sixteen out of 24 cited incidents consisted of tense verbal exchanges and disruption between parents and school-board members that did not devolve into threats of physical violence.” (i)

Allan Ivarsson concludes… it is obvious the people in the NSBA incited false allegations against the FBI and did inadvertently encourage an unjust lawsuit, started by immature panic thinking people. These NSBA irresponsible people need to be charged with inciting injustice and fined accordingly for their lack of common-sense incompetent behaviour.

The foolish people that filed the lawsuit were misguided and deceitfully advised by the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC).

Adage… “What goes around comes around.” Karma/Result/Consequence.

There is no place for liars as leaders in a society. The Ninth Commandment states…

“Thou shalt not give false evidence against any person. The truth must always be tabled, the deliberate tabling of deceit against a person is an act of dishonour.

Allan Ivarsson 2021

Founder, director, chairman of ‘things to come’ called ‘Cosmicism’. The way of ‘Blue Light Cosmic Philosophy’, the way of ‘Cosmic Libertarianism’ which uses the most advanced intelligence in the Universe called ‘Philosophical Intelligence’.

Ps. This Treatise was researched and written by me, stop/start when I was suffering ill health. Hence, I was slower to publish earlier as I refuse to publish my work, self-edited, until I know it is accurate and truthful. I trust this work like all of my past years collected work helps people increase their understanding.

FBI you have a great loyal patriotic history, keep fighting to protect and preserve a ‘Free America’.

A.I. comments… 51% of Americans made a serious mistake, they voted for the wrong President. They chose incompetent idiot Biden, when they should have voted in Donald Trump in for second term. Now Americans are paying the price for their wrong thinking decision.

%d bloggers like this: